Cars.com Super Bowl Ad, Worth $3 Million?
Ethan Lyon | Feb 07, 2010 | Comments 6
Grade: 6 / 10
In this year’s Cars.com Superbowl ad, we follow Timothy Richman — much like Abernathy in 2009 — along his incredible journey, where knowledge empowers him to do great things. The commercial tells the many extraordinary tales of Timothy, including how he used his knowledge of veterinary obstetrics to deliver a Tiger whelp — quite ridiculous, but not without its charm. Though this charm might be appreciated by the 64 percent of guys watching the Superbowl, if we take a deeper look, nearly half of Cars.com’s audience is female.
Cars.com’s audience not completely in-line with Superbowl viewers. Age is almost right on, as the majority of Cars.com users are 18-34 (or 38 percent), and 27 percent of Superbowl users are 18-34. Gender is a different story. Sixty four percent of Superbowl fans are male, while Cars.com have an almost even male / female balance (women need cars too).
While the Cars.com’s commercial is not without its merits, dropping $3 million on one TV spot is an incredibly high ad spend to reach only half of your audience. With nearly $100,000 a second, Cars.com is putting a lot of eggs in one basket. It might make sense for Budwieser, as its target audience is predominately male. Cars.com? Not so much. For just three seconds, or $300,000, Cars.com could hire social marketing guru Chris Brogan to run an “incredibly extensive six-month marketing program, including blogs, video, audio, and webinars, generating consistent new creative ideas.” Such targeted campaigns would most likely give Cars.com more bang for their buck as it could reach both males and females.
Looking at Cars.com’s web traffic, maybe they should take the advice. Cars.com has advertised during the Superbowl for the past three years. How has that worked out? Around this time in ’08, Cars.com had 4.8 million monthly unique users; ’09, 3.6 million; and now, around an estimated 3 million, according to Quantcast. Suggestion: although Superbowl ads give you an uptick in traffic, it’s clearly not sustained. Maybe it needs to speak more to its audience (remember, women buy cars too). For Cars.com’s sake, hopefully next year we will not hear another lofty tale of a man empowered by knowledge or we may hear the sound of money falling on empty seats.
Related posts:
- Kia’s Super Bowl Ad Dances Its Socks Off Vegas... a place to let down your guard, be wild,...
- Top 2010 Super Bowl Ads GoDaddy get's sexy to drive web traffic, Hyundai brings on...
- GoDaddy’s Super Bowl Ad Get’s Sexy, Again Capitalizing on its success of Super Bowl’s past, GoDaddy.com has...
- Hyundai’s Super Bowl Ad Features Brett Favre This year, Hyundai is bringing in a bit of humor...
- Audi Goes Green for the Super Bowl We give credit to Audi for standing out with their...
Filed Under: Digital Marketing



Very good well informed ty you for the information. From the guys at Bloggles
This ad like last years was horrible and a big waist of money for Cars.com.
This company should focus more on advertising on a regular basis in all of their markets instead of dumping such a large amount on one poorly made ad!!!
Yeah, the dip in traffic might be due to the huge dip in the economy and the auto sector as a whole. Edmunds percentage downwards is almost identical. New car sales used to be 17 million a year, last year just over 10 mil.
I thought the cars.com ad was the best of the bunch this year.
Quite the contrary, I loved this ad. It caught my attention immediately and held it all the while making me wonder what product it was for. There weren’t a lot of ads targeted towards women tonight at all and some were specifically trying to offend them. I found it to be well-made, and had a story plot, which most women love. All said, aside from some of the funny ads not geared to the college frat-boy mentallity, it made my list of the top 5 memorable of the night.
Actually, I thought this ad was surprisingly well-done. As I write, I am watching a pretty ridiculous ad my Dockers!